"This is a subliminal message," the star's lawyer says of the commercial, which showcases a boyfriend-stealing baby.

AP: MINEOLA, NY - Lindsay Lohan is feuding with the E-Trade babies. ... I believe the advert is protected because it's a parody. Nice try, Lindsay. Nico_la: I believe the advert is protected because it's a parody. http://www.huffingtonpost. com/social/Nico_la/lindsay-lohan-suing-etrad_n_491298_43608398.html. Permalink | Share it · photo · HappyMarsden 12:07 AM on 3/25/2010. 43 Fans. How exactly does she know they weren't talking about Lindsey Buckingham? ...

In new court papers, a lawyer for Lindsay Lohan claims that E*Trade's Super Bowl ad, which featured a milkaholic called 'Lindsay,' could not refer to any other Lindsay. Read this blog post by Chris Matyszczyk on Technically Incorrect. ... by radioswade August 25, 2010 5:54 AM PDT: aren't parody and satire already considered protected speech? so even if they did use the name 'Lindsey" in reference to Lohan, she still can not win in court: Like this Reply to this comment ...

Mostly out-of-work actress and serial rehabber Lindsay Lohan is suing E-Trade, insisting that their latest commercial featuring a "milkaholic" baby also named Lindsay is based on her. We hadn't thought of that, but now that she ... "Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit," LiLo's lawyer Stephanie Ovadia said."They used the name Lindsay. They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? ...